The Martyrdom of the Apostles: Would They Die for a Lie?

---

The 12 Disciples of Jesus

Some lies are easy to tell. A quiet exaggeration here, a truth conveniently left unsaid there—the kind that slips past unnoticed, leaving little trace. But lies wither under pressure. And when the cost of deception is suffering, imprisonment, or death, the truth—however inconvenient—almost always rises to the surface.

Yet the twelve apostles—the ones who walked closest to Jesus, the ones who would have known if the resurrection was a hoax—never recanted. They were threatened, tortured, and, in many cases, killed. Not for a belief, but for a claim: that they had seen the risen Christ with their own eyes, after the cross.

According to the earliest traditions, this is how they died:

• Andrew – Crucified on an X-shaped cross in Patras, Greece.
• Bartholomew (Nathanael) – Martyred in Armenia.
• James the Just – Stoned to death in Jerusalem.
• James, son of Zebedee – Beheaded in Jerusalem.
• John – Exiled to Patmos, but died a natural death in Ephesus.
• Luke – Likely martyred in Greece, though accounts vary.
• Mark – Dragged to death by a horse in Alexandria, Egypt.
• Matthew – Killed by a sword in Ethiopia.
• Matthias – Stoned and beheaded in Jerusalem.
• Simon Peter – Crucified upside down in Rome.
• Philip – Crucified in Phrygia, preaching until his final breath.
• Thomas – Stabbed to death with a spear in India.

Each name is more than a line in history—it is a life, a heart, and a voice that once spoke and stood for something they could not deny.

And so we are left not only with the record of their suffering, but with the question that will not leave us alone: Why did they stand firm, even when it cost them everything?

Before we can answer that, we first have to understand who they were.

Who Were the Twelve Apostles?

The twelve apostles were not scholars, nor were they men of influence. They were fishermen, a tax collector, and a zealot¹—ordinary lives drawn into an extraordinary story. When Jesus called them, it was not their status or education He saw, but their willingness to follow—to leave behind what was safe and known, and to step into a future they could not yet imagine.

They did not follow for knowledge alone. They followed to carry a message that would move through history like fire. Sent to heal the sick, to lift the broken, to bring light into places still shadowed by fear, they became the first hands and voices of the Gospel—laying the foundation of a kingdom not built by strategy or strength, but by faith.

Three among them—Simon Peter, James, and John—were drawn even closer. They stood within the inner circle, witnessing moments few others would see: the radiance of the Transfiguration,² the sorrow of Gethsemane,³ the stillness of prayer before the cross.⁴

And one among them—Judas Iscariot—chose another path. For thirty pieces of silver,⁵ he handed over his Teacher to the authorities, setting in motion the night of trial and crucifixion. Yet even this fracture had been foretold. Even this heartbreak did not catch heaven by surprise.⁶

After Judas’ death,⁷ the remaining eleven sought to complete their number. Through prayer and discernment, they chose Matthias to take his place—a quiet reminder that the story was never carried by individuals alone, but by the faithfulness of many, held together by a hand greater than their own.

Were They Willing to Die for a Lie?

Sceptics often note that history is filled with people who died for causes that proved false—political martyrs, religious fanatics, followers of failed movements—and they are right. People have gone to their graves believing they stood for truth.

But there is a difference: people may die for what they believe to be true; they do not die for what they know to be false.

The twelve apostles were not preserving a tradition, nor defending a philosophy. They were not rallying behind an idea passed down through generations. They were eyewitnesses—men who had walked beside Jesus Christ, heard His voice, watched His crucifixion, and, according to their own repeated testimony, seen Him alive again.

If the resurrection had been a fabrication, they would have been the ones to know. They had already seen betrayal fracture their circle when Judas Iscariot turned away. They knew what it meant to misplace trust. Yet when Jesus called them back together—when He restored Simon Peter from his denial—the eleven stood firm.

When Jesus called them back—when He restored Simon Peter, and the eleven apostles stood again as one—they did not run. They remained.

So we are left with a question that history has yet to answer fully: what compelled ordinary men to endure suffering, exile, torture, and death? What held them steady when every incentive pointed toward silence?

And does their willingness to suffer—and to die—still point, not merely to a belief, but to a moment they could not unsee: the resurrection of Jesus Christ?

Separating History from Legend

If we are to follow a strict historical method, the most reliable accounts will always be those written closest to the events—the New Testament itself, along with non-Christian voices like Josephus and Tacitus. These first-century sources confirm the persecution of early Christians and, in some cases, the martyrdom of key figures such as James, son of Zebedee, and Paul.

Second-century writers, including Clement of Rome and Irenaeus, still carry significant historical weight. Though not eyewitnesses, they lived close enough to the apostles’ generation to preserve tradition with care. Their accounts offer valuable testimony about the lives and deaths of the twelve, though naturally, the chain of transmission must be handled with thoughtful scrutiny—testing the sources they relied upon and the stories they inherited.

It is only when we move deeper into the third, fourth, and later centuries that the picture begins to shift. In texts like the Acts of Peter, the Acts of Thomas, and other apocryphal writings, the task is no longer simply to gather information, but to separate history from devotion, and memory from embellishment. These later sources may carry echoes of truth, but confirming their accuracy requires close attention to the voices they preserved, the motives behind them, and the worlds they reflect.

Consider, for example:

• The Acts of Peter describes Peter’s crucifixion upside down—a tradition widely accepted within Christianity, though unconfirmed by any first-century document.
• The Acts of Thomas tells of Thomas building a palace for an Indian king before his death—an account understood by most scholars today as symbolic rather than historical.

The closer we remain to the events themselves, the harder it becomes for fiction to take root. And it is from that firmer ground that we now turn to three apostles whose stories rise first from the earliest pages of history.

What Can We Prove?

History rarely comes without entanglement. Memories blur, legends grow, and over time it becomes difficult to separate what was sacred from what was simply told. Yet some moments remain unusually clear—accounts of apostles whose deaths are anchored not only in Christian remembrance but in the earliest strata of recorded history. And when those accounts are echoed beyond the Church—by sources with no reason to defend the faith—they become something more than tradition. They become evidence.

One of the most striking is James, the brother of the Lord Jesus. Unlike many of the twelve apostles, James was not a follower during Jesus’ ministry. The Gospels describe him as a sceptic (John 7:2–5), standing apart even as others gathered in belief. Yet something changed after the crucifixion—something so decisive, so undeniable, that this former outsider rose to become a central figure in the Jerusalem church. From disbelief to leadership, his transformation was not emotional or symbolic—it was personal. Something, or someone, had convinced him.

Of all the apostolic martyrdoms, his is among the clearest. It is preserved not only in the writings of early Christians but confirmed by non-Christian historians—a rare convergence in ancient history, and one that even sceptics have struggled to ignore. Josephus, writing near the close of the first century, records the death of James with little embellishment and no theological motive, describing a man executed in Jerusalem for his unwavering influence.

It leaves us asking—what could compel Saint James, the sceptic, the brother, the outsider, to lay down his life rather than deny what he had seen with his own eyes?

Apostle James: Stoned to Death in Jerusalem (62 AD)

A first-century Jewish historian unaffiliated with Christianity records it plainly. Flavius Josephus—a Pharisee⁸ and chronicler of his people’s history, describes the moment James, the brother of Jesus Christ, was sentenced to death in Antiquities of the Jews (20.9.1):⁹

“He [Ananus] convened the Sanhedrin of judges and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others… and after forming an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned.”

Josephus was not defending Christian tradition or promoting resurrection claims. He was documenting a historical event—non-Christian testimony that anchors James’ martyrdom firmly in the New Testament era and the world of early Christianity.

His account confirms three historical facts:

1. James was publicly known as Jesus’ brother.
2. – He rose to leadership within the early church in Jerusalem, even as other disciples found themselves scattered.
3. He was condemned and stoned to death under the authority of the Sanhedrin, around 62 AD—after the holy spirit was said to empower the twelve apostles at Pentecost.

From Sceptic to Martyr

Before his death, James was more than a follower—he was its first leader. He managed the affairs of the Christian church in Jerusalem, even as tax collectors, Pharisees, and Roman authorities watched closely.

What happened to bring him from doubter to martyr? According to Paul, James was one of the eleven apostles who encountered the risen Jesus—listed alongside Simon Peter’s brother, John (the beloved disciple), and James son of Alphaeus (Mark 3:18; Acts 1:13). In 1 Corinthians 15:6–7 (as Jesus answered Paul’s epistles), Paul confirms that James saw the risen Christ.

The claim is simple and uncompromising: He did not die for a story. He died for what he said he had seen.

A Scientific Approach to History

How confident can we be in this event?

• Probability
  The story fits its historical context. Jewish authorities had the means and motive to execute a public leader of the Christian movement.
• Consistency
  The testimony appears in multiple sources—from the synoptic gospels to Acts to Josephus and later church historians.
• Corroboration
  It stands on firm ground independently—outside Christian writings, from a historian with no theological agenda.

Unlike martyrdom legends from the third and fourth centuries, James’ death is not a tale shaped by legend or Bible translations. It is a factual moment rooted in historical circumstance, preserved early, and passed into Christian faith with sober precision.

If it had been a fabrication, there would have been every reason—both religious and political—to expose it. Instead, the testimony held—and still holds.

James—the sceptic, the brother, the martyr—did not die for an ideology. He died for a perception that transformed him into the first of the apostles to die. His story does not ask us to believe blindly. It invites us to follow the evidence.

Apostle Peter: Crucified in Rome (64–67 AD)

Among the twelve apostles, few stand as prominently as Simon Peter. A fisherman by trade, he was drawn into Jesus’ inner circle—a witness to miracles, to glory, and to grief. Yet when the shadows deepened, when Jesus was arrested and the trial began, Peter faltered. Gripped by fear, he denied Him three times.

But the man who once hid in the courtyard would not remain hidden. In the decades that followed, Peter emerged as a pillar of the early church—bold, unwavering, and unwilling to be silent. And when he reached Rome under the rule of Nero,¹⁰ he knew what it would cost. He did not seek martyrdom. But when it came, he did not run.

Unlike some of the twelve apostles, Peter’s death is anchored in both Christian and non-Christian testimony. His martyrdom, while not recorded in the New Testament, is preserved by voices close enough to remember and clear enough to be heard.

1 Clement (c. 95 AD)

Written within a generation of Peter’s death, the letter of 1 Clement,¹¹ is one of the earliest Christian documents outside the Bible. From the church in Rome, Clement reflects:

“Let us set before our eyes the good apostles: Peter, who endured not one or two, but many labours, and at last, having delivered his testimony, departed unto the place of glory due to him.”

The phrase delivered his testimony¹² was not a poetic flourish. It was a known expression for martyrdom—for a life given, not merely lived.

Tacitus (115–117 AD)

From outside the Christian tradition, the Roman senator¹³ and historian Tacitus,¹⁴ confirms the broader context. Writing of the Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD, he records how Emperor Nero deflected blame by accusing the early Christians:

“Nero fastened the guilt [of the fire] and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace… Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt.”

Tacitus does not name Peter. But his description of Nero’s persecution matches precisely when Christian tradition places the apostle’s death—by crucifixion, in Rome.

The Tradition of Peter’s Crucifixion Upside Down

According to The Acts of Peter—a second-century¹⁵ text from outside the New Testament canon—Peter asked to be crucified upside down, considering himself unworthy to die as Jesus did. Though the source is later and apocryphal, the tradition did not emerge in a vacuum. Origen,¹⁶ writing in the third century, affirms it. So does Eusebius,¹⁷ the first great historian of the Christian church.

Though The Acts of Peter is not a first-century source, the idea gained traction because it echoed a tradition already known to the early church. Writers such as Origen (c. 185–254 AD) and Eusebius (c. 260–339 AD) affirmed the account, reinforcing its widespread acceptance.

This image—Peter, head-down on a cross, body broken but spirit unshaken—became a symbol of the faith he carried to the end.

Why It Matters

• From Denial to Devotion
  This was the same Simon Peter who once swore he never knew Jesus. Yet in the end, he stood in the centre of Rome—the capital of empire, the seat of Caesar—and refused to deny Him again.
• The Weight of Evidence
  No formal Roman record of Peter’s execution has survived. But the convergence of early Christian voices and Roman history makes his death one of the most historically grounded of all the apostles. The upside-down crucifixion may come from later tradition, but it reflects a story already known and accepted within the early church.
• No Motive to Invent
  If the resurrection of Jesus Christ had been a fabrication, Peter would have been the first to know. He was not defending a philosophy. He was not preserving a myth. He died for a truth he claimed to have seen with his own eyes.

A fisherman with no wealth. A leader with no sword. A man who denied the Lord once, and then spent the rest of his life making sure he never did again.

Apostle Paul: Beheaded in Rome (64–67 AD)

If there was ever a man least likely to become a follower of Jesus, it was Paul of Tarsus. Known first as Saul, he was a Pharisee of status and conviction—deeply loyal to the law, and determined to stamp out the Christian movement before it could take root. He pursued the early church with zeal, imprisoning believers and approving their deaths.

But something happened—something so disruptive, so complete, that it rewrote the course of his life.

Paul claimed that the change began on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:1–19). According to his own account, he encountered the risen Christ in a moment that shattered everything he thought he knew. The persecutor became a witness. And from that day forward, he would carry the name of Jesus not with reluctance, but with unwavering resolve—across cities, continents, and empires.

And like Simon Peter, he would pay for that witness with his life.

1 Clement (c. 95 AD)

The earliest surviving reference to Paul’s martyrdom comes from 1 Clement—within a generation of Paul’s death. Addressing the church in Corinth, Clement of Rome writes:

“Through envy and jealousy, the greatest and most righteous pillars were persecuted and contended unto death… Paul also obtained the reward of endurance, after being seven times thrown into captivity, compelled to flee, and stoned. After preaching both in the East and West, he gained the noble renown of his faith. Having taught righteousness to the whole world and come to the extreme limit of the West, he suffered martyrdom under the prefects.”

Clement does not mention beheading. But his language is clear: Paul was executed under Roman authority, and the weight of his testimony endured.

Eusebius (311–324 AD)

A few centuries later, Eusebius of Caesarea would preserve the tradition in more specific terms:

“Thus was Nero publicly announced as the first among the emperors to be an enemy of the divine religion. He was led on to the slaughter of the apostles. It is, therefore, recorded that Paul was beheaded in Rome itself, and that Peter was likewise crucified under Nero. This account is substantiated by the name of Peter and Paul remaining in that city to the present day.”

As a Roman citizen, Paul would have been spared the indignity of crucifixion. Beheading was swift, and in the eyes of Roman law, more honourable. Christian tradition holds that it took place outside the city walls—along the Ostian Way—around 64 to 67 AD.

While Eusebius was not a first-hand witness, his account reflects a memory already embedded in the early church, carried forward by those still living in the long shadow of persecution.

Why It Matters

• From Opponent to Apostle
  Paul did not inherit the Gospel. He opposed it. He had everything to lose—status, influence, belonging—yet something overturned his world and compelled him to give it all away. His conversion was not convenient. It cost him everything.
• Multiple Early Sources
  Though no Roman trial records survive, both 1 Clement and Eusebius offer independent witness to Paul’s martyrdom in Rome—an event that fits precisely within Nero’s known campaign of violence against the Christian community.
• No Motive to Die For a Lie
  If Paul had fabricated his experience, there would have been every reason to abandon it when the cost became clear. Yet he remained—through floggings, shipwrecks, imprisonments, and trial—until the moment he faced the executioner’s sword.

Paul did not die for power or approval. He died for a name he once tried to erase—and for a truth he would never again let go.

Could They Have Lied?

History is filled with deceivers—cult leaders who manipulate, fraudsters who fabricate, men who twist the truth for money, power, or influence.

But the twelve apostles were not those men.

They had no wealth to protect, no platform to defend, no political connections to shield them. If anything, their allegiance to Jesus made them fugitives—hunted, beaten, imprisoned, and ultimately killed.

And yet they went to their deaths rather than deny the resurrection.

If it had been a fabrication, they would have been the ones to know. This was not a secondhand belief or a tradition handed down through generations. It was a claim of firsthand experience—either they had seen the risen Christ, or they had not.

So when the pressure came, and the cost became everything, why did not even one of them step back?

Addressing Skeptic Objections

Skeptics have plenty to say about the apostles’ deaths as proof of resurrection. Some argue that people die for false faiths all the time. Others propose the twelve apostles were deceived, hallucinating, mentally ill, or even lying. Do these objections hold up? Let’s examine them closely.

1. “People die for false religions all the time.”

True—devotees from Buddhism to Hinduism, Islam to tribal cults have given their lives for belief.

But there’s a crucial difference in this case. Those were inherited traditions, distant from any founding event. The twelve apostles were eyewitnesses—disciples called by Jesus Christ himself. They didn’t pass on stories; they proclaimed firsthand encounters. This wasn’t inherited faith—it was firsthand testimony. And when pressured, they did not back down.

2. “Maybe they just hallucinated Jesus.”

Hallucinations cannot explain mass eyewitness testimony.

Psychologists agree—hallucinations are personal experiences, shaped by internal emotions and expectations. They do not occur in large, coordinated groups, and certainly not among people who were not anticipating a return from the dead.

Yet in 1 Corinthians 15:3–7, Paul lists multiple encounters—Simon Peter saw Him. The twelve apostles saw Him. A crowd of more than 500 witnessed Him at the same time.

Even sceptics responded. James, son of Alphaeus, saw Him. So did Paul himself, once a fierce persecutor. And Doubting Thomas,¹⁸ unwilling to believe without proof, later gave his life for the claim.

Hallucinations do not turn sceptics into martyrs or former enemies into defenders of the faith. They do not transform lives across cultures, continents, and generations. Something happened—something that could not be explained away, and would not be taken back.

3. “How do we know 500 people saw him at once?”

If this claim had been fabricated, early critics of Christianity would have challenged it—but they didn’t.

Opponents like Celsus,¹⁹ writing in the second century AD, launched sharp attacks against the Christian faith, calling it irrational and deceptive. Yet not one of them directly refuted Paul’s claim that more than 500 people saw the risen Jesus at once.

Paul made that statement in 1 Corinthians 15:6—just decades after the crucifixion—and noted that many of those witnesses were still alive. If it had been false, it could have been swiftly exposed. These were not anonymous followers or later converts. They were eyewitnesses from the first generation of believers, the same community that formed the core of the early church.

The New Testament never treats this as a metaphor or symbol. It presents it as historical testimony. And the absence of serious pushback, even from Christianity’s earliest critics, suggests something important—either the claim was broadly accepted, or it was impossible to discredit.

4. “The story was exaggerated over time.”

That only works if time was on their side. But it wasn’t.

Sceptics argue that the martyrdoms of the twelve apostles were later embellishments—stories that grew grander with each retelling. But the historical record says otherwise.

• The deaths of James, Peter, and Paul are recorded in early, non-Christian sources (Josephus, Tacitus, 1 Clement).
• Paul was writing about Jesus’ resurrection within twenty to thirty years of the event.

The apostles were not part of a long, evolving folklore; they were proclaiming their testimony—and dying for it—within their own lifetimes, long before legend had time to take root.

5. “They were just lying to gain power.”

Power? What power?

If the apostles were lying, what exactly did they stand to gain—no political influence, no wealth, no security—only persecution, exile, and execution.

Liars break when the cost becomes too high. The apostles had every reason to recant, yet none of them did.

6. “Maybe they were mentally ill.”

Delusion does not launch a global movement.

If the apostles had been mentally unstable, we would expect disorganised teaching, contradictory testimony, erratic behaviour under pressure.

Instead, what do we see? A unified, coherent message that spread across the Roman world. Consistent, unwavering testimony even under threat of death. No signs of psychosis, irrationality, or instability in their writings or actions.

Mentally ill people do not establish the largest, most enduring movement in human history. Whatever happened to the apostles, it wasn’t delusion—it was something undeniable, something they chose to die for rather than deny.

Conclusion: Why This Matters

You can dismiss legends, ignore traditions, and write off stories that grew with time—but you cannot ignore what happened to the 12 disciples of Jesus. These were men who chose death rather than deny what they had seen.

They were not radicals chasing a cause, nor zealots defending a philosophy. They were fishermen, tax collectors, sons and brothers—ordinary men with every reason to walk away.

And yet they stayed. They stood their ground and accepted death not because it was forced upon them, but because they had seen something they could not deny.

A man crucified. Dead. Buried. And three days later—walking, speaking, living.

The resurrection of Jesus is not just a story handed down. It is the event that split history in two—the moment that changed everything, not just for them, but for you.

Perhaps you were not there when the stone was rolled away. You did not stand before Him and see the scars in His hands. You did not hear Him call you by name²⁰—but they did. And they gave their lives so that you might know it.

So the question is not whether they believed it.

The question is—will you?

Footnotes

1. Zealot — In first-century Judea, zealots were members of a political movement fiercely opposed to Roman occupation. They believed in the need for active resistance, sometimes even violence, to restore Jewish freedom. Simon, one of the twelve apostles, had once been part of this group—highlighting how Jesus’ call crossed even the deepest social and political divides. ↩︎
2. Transfiguration — The Transfiguration refers to the moment when Jesus was revealed in divine glory before Peter, James, and John on a high mountain. His face shone like the sun, and His clothes became dazzling white, as Moses and Elijah appeared beside Him. This event affirmed His divine identity and foreshadowed both His suffering and His resurrection. It is recorded in Matthew 17, Mark 9, and Luke 9:28-36. ↩︎
3. Sorrow of Gethsemane — In the Garden of Gethsemane, on the night before His crucifixion, Jesus prayed in deep anguish. Facing the full weight of what lay ahead, He wrestled with sorrow so intense that His sweat fell like drops of blood. Yet even in His grief, He submitted fully to the Father’s will. This moment of surrender is recorded in Matthew 26:36-46, Mark 14:32-42, and Luke 22:39-46. ↩︎
4. The Prayer at Gethsemane — Before His arrest, Jesus withdrew into quiet prayer, seeking strength from the Father as He faced betrayal, suffering, and death. This stillness was not a retreat from pain, but a preparation to walk through it—an act of trust that shaped the final hours of His earthly life. ↩︎
5. Thirty Pieces of Silver — Judas agreed to betray Jesus for thirty pieces of silver—the traditional price of a slave under ancient Jewish law. The smallness of the amount highlights the contempt both Judas and the religious authorities held towards Jesus, valuing His life at the cost of the lowest in society. Exodus 21:32. ↩︎
6. The Betrayal Prophecy — Judas’ betrayal was not an unexpected failure. It had been foretold in Scripture, fulfilling prophecies such as Psalm 41:9, which spoke of a trusted friend turning against the one he had shared bread with. Even in betrayal, the hand of God was still unfolding the story. ↩︎
7. Judas’ Death — After betraying Jesus, Judas was overcome by guilt and despair. According to the Gospel of Matthew, he returned the silver and took his own life. His death stands as a tragic reminder of how sorrow without repentance can crush a soul—but also how redemption, even then, remained possible through Christ. Matthew 27:3–5. ↩︎
8. Pharisee — The Pharisees were a religious and political group within first-century Judaism, known for their strict observance of the Law and traditions. They held significant influence over Jewish society and religious life. Although not all Pharisees opposed Jesus, it was members of this group—along with the chief priests—who played a leading role in calling for His arrest and crucifixion. Josephus, himself a former Pharisee, later chronicled aspects of their movement from within. ↩︎
9. Antiquities of the Jews (20.9.1) — Josephus, Flavius. Antiquities of the Jews. Translated by William Whiston, book 20, chapter 9, section 1, Tufts University, Perseus Digital Library. ↩︎
10. Nero — Nero Claudius Caesar ruled as emperor of Rome from 54 to 68 AD. His reign is remembered for political chaos, brutal persecution of Christians, and the devastating Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD, after which he shifted blame onto the Christian community to divert suspicion from himself. His rule ended in rebellion and suicide, leaving behind a legacy of cruelty and corruption. britishmuseum.org. ↩︎
11. 1 Clement — Clement of Rome. 1 Clement. Translated by J.B. Lightfoot earlychristianwritings.com. ↩︎
12. “Delivered His Testimony” — In 1 Clement (c. 95 AD), the phrase “having delivered his testimony” is widely understood by scholars as a reference to martyrdom. In early Christian writings, the Greek word martyria (μαρτυρία)—translated “testimony”—was often used to describe bearing witness to faith even unto death. Clement’s language, though restrained, aligns with the tradition that Peter was executed for his unwavering witness to Christ. See: The Apostolic Fathers, edited and translated by Bart D. Ehrman, Harvard University Press, 2003, Vol. 1, p. 65. harvard.edu. ↩︎
13. Roman Senator — A Roman senator was a member of the highest political and aristocratic class in ancient Rome. Senators held considerable influence over law, governance, and military affairs. If Pilate consulted the Roman authorities before sentencing Jesus to death—as some scholars suggest—the senators would have been among those indirectly responsible for authorising His crucifixion. As a body loyal to Rome’s gods and political order, the Roman Senate did not believe in Jesus’ messianic claims and viewed early Christianity with suspicion or hostility. See: The Senate of Imperial Rome by Richard J.A. Talbert, Princeton University Press, 1984. princeton.edu. ↩︎
14. Tacitus — Tacitus. Annals. Translated by Alfred John Church and William Jackson Brodribb. mit.edu. ↩︎
15. The Tradition of Peter’s Crucifixion — The tradition that Peter was crucified upside down stems from the Acts of Peter (late second century) and early church writers such as Origen and Eusebius. Origen, as cited in Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History (3.1.2), notes Peter’s request to be crucified head-down, regarding himself unworthy to die like Christ. Though Acts of Peter is apocryphal and Eusebius wrote centuries later, their testimony reflects traditions already widely accepted by the early church. For Nero’s persecution of Christians, see Tacitus, Annals 15.44. penguinrandomhouse.com. ↩︎
16. Origen — Origen of Alexandria (c. 185–253 AD) was one of the most influential early Christian theologians and scholars. Though some of his views were later considered controversial, his writings helped shape early Christian doctrine. Origen is one of the earliest known sources to affirm the tradition that Simon Peter was crucified upside down. His account is cited by Eusebius in Ecclesiastical History (3.1.2), contributing to the tradition’s widespread acceptance in the early church. See: Origen: An Exhortation to Martyrdom, Prayer, First Principles (Oxford University Press, 1979). archive.org. ↩︎
17. Eusebius — Eusebius of Caesarea (c. 260–339 AD) was a historian, bishop, and scholar often referred to as the “Father of Church History.” His monumental work Ecclesiastical History preserved key traditions of the early church, including details about the martyrdom of apostles such as Peter and Paul. While not a first-century witness, Eusebius drew from earlier sources and oral traditions still within reach of living memory. His writings remain one of the most comprehensive historical windows into the church’s formative centuries. See: The Ecclesiastical History translated by Kirsopp Lake, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1926. loebclassics.com. ↩︎
18. Doubting Thomas — Thomas, also called “Didymus,” was one of the twelve apostles (John 11:16; 20:24). After the resurrection, Thomas initially refused to believe the other disciples’ report that Jesus had risen, declaring he would not believe unless he saw and touched the wounds himself (John 20:24–25). A week later, Jesus appeared to him directly, inviting him to see and touch His scars (John 20:26–29). Thomas’ transformation from scepticism to worship (“My Lord and my God!”) became one of the earliest testimonies to the reality of the resurrection. ↩︎
19. Celsus — Celsus was a second-century Greek philosopher and outspoken critic of early Christianity. Around 175–180 AD, he authored The True Word (or The True Doctrine), a polemical attack on Christian beliefs. Though his original text is lost, much of it survives through extensive quotations in Origen’s rebuttal, Contra Celsum. Celsus accused Christians of irrationality, deception, and fabricating elements of Jesus’ life—but notably, he did not challenge specific claims such as the appearances of Jesus to over 500 witnesses (1 Corinthians 15:6), which suggests those accounts were already widely circulated and difficult to refute. See: Origen, Against Celsus, translated by Henry Chadwick, Cambridge University Press, 1953. cambridge.org. ↩︎
20. Isaiah 43:1 — “Do not fear, for I have redeemed you; I have called you by name; you are mine.” ↩︎